What you are hearing is the product of a continuing search to find a way to communicate what happens in the space between, to make it less compartmentalized, to revel in its slow, staidness. Coming from a place known and distant, it happened and is happening now.
There are two of us, but we enlisted a third of the same. The beginning, beginning shortly (should be just a few minutes now) is borrowed of _______________, a result of his ___________ with _________. We (all of us) enjoyed it so much that we wanted to share it with you. We like to think it is/was intended to exist in the space between the beginning and end, but not the middle. Something more like this:
{______}
/ \
/ \
/ \
/ \
/ \
/ \
/ \
/ \
/ \
/ \
/ \
/ \
/ \
Setting out / *work* \ Conclusion
but with greater multi-dimensionality and less of a qualitative/judgmental bent. With potential, and verve. Language is of a successive nature, and doesn’t lend itself easily to reasoning on eternal, non-temporal matters, but, still.
Four o’clock we were there, ___ said. Or was it Eleven. Why, I thought so too. Its changing status and stasis intrinsic to one another, the difficulty of expressing is the whole thing. Why, I thought so too. Far too often afraid but far too infrequently leaving. Doing. Here, _______ says. This is big.
And so, you see - there is a third moment to consider unfolding. The center uncertainty is proposed here. “What’s that?” Like I/We/He said, not beginning, not conclusion, but not close to the middle. Separate but in the fucking thick of it. On and on, but important, as all these words fail.
Listen? Listen.